Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 26
Filter
1.
researchsquare; 2023.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-3008644.v1

ABSTRACT

Purpose: SARS-CoV-2 reinfections have been frequent, even among those vaccinated. The aim of this study is to know if hybrid immunity (infection+vaccination) is affected by the moment of vaccination and the number of doses received. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in 745 patients with a history of COVID-19 reinfection and recovered the dates of infection and reinfection and vaccination status (date and number of doses). To assess differences in the time to reinfection(tRI) between unvaccinated, vaccinated before 6 months and later, and comparing one, two or three doses(incomplete, complete and booster regime) we performed  the log-rank test of the cumulative incidence calculated as 1 minus the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Results: The tRI was significantly higher in those vaccinated vs. non-vaccinated (q<0.001). However, an early incomplete regime(1 dose) protects similar time than not receiving a vaccine. Vaccination before 6 months after infection showed a lower tRI compared to those vaccinated later with the same regime(q<0.001). Actually, early vaccination with complete(2 doses) and booster regimes(3 doses) provided lower length of protection compared to vaccinating later with incomplete(1 dose) and complete regime(2 doses), respectively.  Vaccination with complete and booster regimes significantly increases the tRI(q<0.001). Conclusion: Vaccination increases the time it takes for a person to become reinfected with SARS-CoV-2. Increasing the time from infection to vaccination increases the time in which a person could be reinfected. Booster doses increase the time to reinfection. Those results emphasize the role of vaccines and boosters during the pandemic and can guide strategies on future vaccination policy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
2.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 10(4): ofad133, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2304904

ABSTRACT

Background: The Clinical Trial of Sarilumab in Adults With COVID-19 (SARICOR) showed that patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia and increased levels of interleukin (IL)-6 might benefit from blockade of the IL-6 pathway. However, the benefit from this intervention might not be uniform. In this subanalysis, we sought to determine if other immunoactivation markers, besides IL-6, could identify which subgroup of patients benefit most from this intervention. Methods: The SARICOR trial was a phase II, open-label, multicenter, controlled trial (July 2020-March 2021) in which patients were randomized to receive usual care (UC; control group), UC plus a single dose of sarilumab 200 mg (sarilumab-200 group), or UC plus a single dose of sarilumab 400 mg (sarilumab-400 group). Patients who had baseline serum samples for cytokine determination (IL-8, IL-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, interferon-inducible protein [IP]-10) were included in this secondary analysis. Progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) according to cytokine levels and treatment received was evaluated. Results: One hundred one (88%) of 115 patients enrolled in the SARICOR trial had serum samples (control group: n = 33; sarilumab-200: n = 33; sarilumab-400: n = 35). Among all evaluated biomarkers, IP-10 showed the strongest association with treatment outcome. Patients with IP-10 ≥2500 pg/mL treated with sarilumab-400 had a lower probability of progression (13%) compared with the control group (58%; hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.90; P = .04). Conversely, patients with IP-10 <2500 pg/mL did not show these differences. Conclusions: IP-10 may predict progression to ARDS in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and IL-6 levels >40 pg/mL. Importantly, IP-10 value <2500 pg/mL might discriminate those individuals who might not benefit from sarilumab therapy among those with high IL-6 levels.

3.
medrxiv; 2023.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2023.04.27.23289234

ABSTRACT

Importance: SARS-CoV-2 infection can result in ongoing, relapsing, or new symptoms or organ dysfunction after the acute phase of infection, termed Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC), or long COVID. The characteristics, prevalence, trajectory and mechanisms of PASC are poorly understood. The objectives of the Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) Tissue Pathology Study (RECOVER-Pathology) are to: (1) characterize prevalence and types of organ injury/disease and pathology occurring with PASC; (2) characterize the association of pathologic findings with clinical and other characteristics; (3) define the pathophysiology and mechanisms of PASC, and possible mediation via viral persistence; and (4) establish a post-mortem tissue biobank and post-mortem brain imaging biorepository. Methods: RECOVER-Pathology is a cross-sectional study of decedents dying at least 15 days following initial SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eligible decedents must meet WHO criteria for suspected, probable, or confirmed infection and must be aged 18 years or more at the time of death. Enrollment occurs at 7 sites in four U.S. states and Washington, DC. Comprehensive autopsies are conducted according to a standardized protocol within 24 hours of death; tissue samples are sent to the PASC Biorepository for later analyses. Data on clinical history are collected from the medical records and/or next of kin. The primary study outcomes include an array of pathologic features organized by organ system. Casual inference methods will be employed to investigate associations between risk factors and pathologic outcomes. Discussion: RECOVER-Pathology is the largest autopsy study addressing PASC among US adults. Results of this study are intended to elucidate mechanisms of organ injury and disease and enhance our understanding of the pathophysiology of PASC.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multiple Organ Failure , Death , Neurocognitive Disorders
4.
medrxiv; 2023.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2023.04.10.23288350

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 affects the population unequally with a higher impact on aged and immunosuppressed people. Hence, we assessed the effect of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in immune compromised patients (older adults and oncohematologic patients), compared with healthy counterparts. While the acquired humoral and cellular memory did not predict subsequent infection 18 months after full immunization, spectral and computational cytometry revealed several subsets within the CD8+ T-cells, B-cells, NK cells, monocytes and CD45RA+CCR7- T{gamma}{delta} cells differentially expressed in further infected and non-infected individuals not just following immunization, but also prior to that. Of note up to 7 subsets were found within the CD45RA+CCR7- T{gamma}{delta} population with some of them being expanded and other decreased in subsequently infected individuals. Moreover, some of these subsets also predicted COVID-induced hospitalization in oncohematologic patients. Therefore, we hereby have identified several cellular subsets that, even before vaccination, strongly related to COVID-19 vulnerability as opposed to the acquisition of cellular and/or humoral memory following vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lymphoma
6.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 721, 2022 Sep 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2009360

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Understanding the immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 virus is critical for efficient monitoring and control strategies. The ProHEpic-19 cohort provides a fine-grained description of the kinetics of antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 infection with an exceptional resolution over 17 months. METHODS: We established a cohort of 769 healthcare workers including healthy and infected with SARS-CoV-2 in northern Barcelona to determine the kinetics of the IgM against the nucleocapsid (N) and the IgG against the N and spike (S) of SARS-CoV-2 in infected healthcare workers. The study period was from 5 May 2020 to 11 November 2021.We used non-linear mixed models to investigate the kinetics of IgG and IgM measured at nine time points over 17 months from the date of diagnosis. The model included factors of time, gender, and disease severity (asymptomatic, mild-moderate, severe-critical) to assess their effects and their interactions. FINDINGS: 474 of the 769 participants (61.6%) became infected with SARS-CoV-2. Significant effects of gender and disease severity were found for the levels of all three antibodies. Median IgM(N) levels were already below the positivity threshold in patients with asymptomatic and mild-moderate disease at day 270 after the diagnosis, while IgG(N and S) levels remained positive at least until days 450 and 270, respectively. Kinetic modelling showed a general rise in both IgM(N) and IgG(N) levels up to day 30, followed by a decay with a rate depending on disease severity. IgG(S) levels remained relatively constant from day 15 over time. INTERPRETATION: IgM(N) and IgG(N, S) SARS-CoV-2 antibodies showed a heterogeneous kinetics over the 17 months. Only the IgG(S) showed a stable increase, and the levels and the kinetics of antibodies varied according to disease severity. The kinetics of IgM and IgG observed over a year also varied by clinical spectrum can be very useful for public health policies around vaccination criteria in adult population. FUNDING: Regional Ministry of Health of the Generalitat de Catalunya (Call COVID19-PoC SLT16_04; NCT04885478).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/epidemiology , Health Personnel , Humans , Immunity, Humoral , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin M , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain/epidemiology
7.
medrxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.08.17.22278894

ABSTRACT

Setting Primary and/or secondary health care data from four European countries: Italy, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Spain Participants Individuals with complete data for the year preceding enrollment or those born at the start of observation time. The cohort comprised 25,720,158 subjects. Interventions First and second dose of Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna, or Janssen COVID-19 vaccine. Main outcome measures 29 adverse events of special interest (AESI): acute aseptic arthritis, acute coronary artery disease, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), acute kidney injury, acute liver injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, anaphylaxis, anosmia or ageusia, arrhythmia, Bells’ palsy, chilblain-like lesions death, erythema multiforme, Guillain Barré Syndrome (GBS), generalized convulsion, haemorrhagic stroke, heart failure, ischemic stroke, meningoencephalitis, microangiopathy, multisystem inflammatory syndrome, myo/pericarditis, myocarditis, narcolepsy, single organ cutaneous vasculitis (SOCV), stress cardiomyopathy, thrombocytopenia, thrombotic thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) venous thromboembolism (VTE) Results 12,117,458 individuals received at least a first dose of COVID-19 vaccine: 54% with Comirnaty (Pfizer), 6% Spikevax (Moderna), 38% Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca) and 2% Janssen Covid-19 vaccine. AESI were very rare <10/100,000 PY in 2020, only thrombotic and cardiac events were uncommon. After adjustment for factors associated with severe COVID, 10 statistically significant associations of pooled incidence rate ratios remained based on dose 1 and 2 combined. These comprised anaphylaxis after AstraZeneca vaccine, TTS after both AstraZeneca and Janssen vaccine, erythema multiforme after Moderna, GBS after Janssen vaccine, SOCV after Janssen vaccine, thrombocytopenia after Janssen and Moderna vaccine and VTE after Moderna and Pfizer vaccines. The pooled rate ratio was more than two-fold increased only for TTS, SOCV and thrombocytopenia. Conclusion We showed associations with several AESI, which remained after adjustment for factors that determined vaccine roll out. Hypotheses testing studies are required to establish causality.


Subject(s)
Encephalomyelitis, Acute Disseminated , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Thrombocytopenia , Chilblains , Arthritis , COVID-19 , Meningoencephalitis , Vasculitis, Leukocytoclastic, Cutaneous , Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases , Myocarditis , Heart Failure , Cerebral Infarction , Olfaction Disorders , Stroke , Guillain-Barre Syndrome , Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy , Venous Thromboembolism , Arrhythmias, Cardiac , Erythema Multiforme , Acute Kidney Injury , Coronary Artery Disease , Liver Diseases
8.
researchsquare; 2022.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-1859526.v1

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Spain as multiple other countries, has been experiencing an increasing and sustained trend in the use of psychotropic medications since the mid 90s. Recent studies show public health measures implemented to control SARS-Cov2, such as mobility restrictions and the shutdown of nonessential activities increased mental suffering, even contributing to a higher number of anxiety, depression and insomnia disorders that could lead to an increase in the consumption of psychotropics. The aims were: 1) Evaluate the temporal trend in psychotropic consumption by therapeutic subgroup, sex, and age group 2) Estimate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic in the use of psychotropic drugs.METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study, retrieving all prescriptions of anxiolytics, hypnotics/sedatives, and antidepressants dispensed in pharmacies of Asturias (Northern Spain) for Primary Care patients for the period 2018-2021.We presented the data expressed in Daily Defined Doses (DDDs) for 1000 persons/day (DHD). To estimate changes in DHDs by year and age group we conducted 2 multiple linear regressions (one for males and one for females) for every therapeutic subgroup studied. Changes were considered statistically significant when the regression coefficient was p<0.05. We used the Software R 4.1.0.RESULTS:For the studied period, the highest DHDs are for antidepressants, although all of the subgroups experienced an increase in consumption rates.Women consumed more psychotropic drugs than men. In 2021, 372 out of every 1,000 women were taking daily 1 DDD of these drugs versus 184 out of every 1,000 men. Consumption rates for all psychotropic drugs progressively increases with age. Conversely, the biggest increases in consumption were among the youngest age groups (0-14 years, 43.2% increase and 15-29 years, 35.1% increase).The regression models suggest an upward trend in psychotropic consumption during all the period, especially remarkable from 2020, for both genders and all age groups. CONCLUSIONS:-The growing and sustained trend in consumption of psychotropic drugs for the recent years has increased since the start of the SARS-COV2 pandemic for both sexes, especially from 2020 onwards. This trend is consistent with the observed national one.-The increase observed on children and adolescents is a matter of concern.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
9.
Education Sciences ; 12(6):377, 2022.
Article in English | MDPI | ID: covidwho-1869523

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 situation has encouraged the creation of ICT-based learning environments. Difficulties in performing activities in a garden setting can be overcome by using Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR). The aim of this research is to evaluate the usefulness of VR and AR as an educational resource through contextualised sensory experiences in the garden. Eighty-seven trainee teachers took part, and a mixed methodology was used, for the analysis of the sound and visual elements of the garden and for reflection on the usefulness of VR and AR. An interpretive and inferential analysis of the AR-based compositions was carried out and of the drawings of the garden created by the participants after the virtual immersion. The results show a bucolic-pastoral vision of the garden with a predominance of natural elements and a human presence that is respectful of the natural environment. During the immersion, >90% of the participants indicated that the sensations were positive and were able to distinguish natural components from human and/or technological items. The role of VR and AR in enhancing the understanding of content is notable, being, at the same time, tool, resource and content, which reinforces the idea that they can favour the development of teaching and digital competences.

10.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 66(2): e0210721, 2022 02 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1799246

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of early treatment with sarilumab, added to standard of care (SOC), in hospitalized adults with COVID-19. Methods included phase II, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and interleukin (IL)-6 levels ≥ 40 pg/mL and/or d-dimer > 1,500 ng/mL. Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to receive SOC (control group), SOC plus a single subcutaneous dose of sarilumab 200 mg (sarilumab-200 group), or SOC plus a single subcutaneous dose of sarilumab 400 mg (sarilumab-400 group). The primary outcome variable was the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring high-flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO), non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) at day 28. One-hundred and 15 participants (control group, n = 39; sarilumab-200, n = 37; sarilumab-400, n = 39) were included. At randomization, 104 (90%) patients had supplemental oxygen and 103 (90%) received corticosteroids. Eleven (28%) patients in the control group, 10 (27%) in sarilumab-200, and five (13%) in sarilumab-400 developed the primary outcome (hazard ratio [95% CI] of sarilumab-400 vs control group: 0.41 [0.14, 1.18]; P = 0.09). Seven (6%) patients died: three in the control group and four in sarilumab-200. There were no deaths in sarilumab-400 (P = 0.079, log-rank test for comparisons with the control group). In patients recently hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia and features of systemic inflammation, early IL-6 blockade with a single dose of sarilumab 400 mg was safe and associated with a trend for better outcomes. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT04357860.).


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Adult , Humans , Inflammation , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
11.
PharmacoEconomics Open ; : 1-10, 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1727737

ABSTRACT

Objective Protection against vaccine-preventable diseases is especially relevant in older adults due to age-related decline in immunity (immunosenescence). However, adult vaccination remains a challenge with overall low coverage rates, which has an impact on both the patients who have these diseases and the health care system in terms of resource use and costs derived. This study aimed to estimate the direct economic impact of herpes zoster, pneumococcal disease, influenza and pertussis in Spanish adults 45 years and older. Methods Data from 2015 were extracted from two Spanish public databases: the Minimum Basic Data Set for Hospitalisations and the Clinical Database of Primary Care. Codes from the International Classification of Diseases and the International Classification of Primary Care were used to identify and classify the diseases analysed. The variables extracted and calculated were hospitalisation (cases, percentage, length of stay, costs, mortality), primary care (cases, percentage, costs) and referrals (cases, percentage, costs). Results were presented for the age groups 45–64 years, 65–74 years, > 74 years and all ages. Results In adults 45 years and older, total costs amounted to €134.1 million in 2015 (i.e. 63.9% of the total direct costs for all age groups): 44.4% due to pneumococcal disease, 39.5% due to influenza, 16.0% due to herpes zoster and 0.1% due to pertussis. Hospitalisations represented 58.1% (€77.9 million) of the total costs, with 15,910 admissions, 144,752 days of hospitalisation and 1170 deaths. Primary care registered 566,556 visits with a cost of €35.0 million, and 269,186 referrals with a cost of €21.1 million. Conclusion The direct economic burden of herpes zoster, pneumococcal disease, influenza and pertussis in adults 45 years and older was high in Spain, and may be underestimated as it only considered medical assistance and not other applicable direct or indirect costs. Increasing vaccination rates in adults may potentially reduce the economic burden derived from these diseases, although future cost-effectiveness analysis including other disease-related costs, vaccination costs and vaccination effectiveness would be needed. Graphical

13.
medrxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.01.29.22270016

ABSTRACT

Background: Almost two years since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic no predictive algorithm has been generally adopted, nor new tests identified to improve the prediction and management of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: Retrospective observational analysis of the predictive performance of clinical parameters and laboratory tests in hospitalised patients with COVID-19. Outcomes were 28-day survival and maximal severity in a cohort of 1,579 patients and two validation cohorts of 598 and 434 patients. A pilot study conducted in a patient subgroup measured 17 cytokines and 27 lymphocyte phenotypes to explore additional predictive laboratory tests. Findings: 1) Despite a strong association of 22 clinical and laboratory variables with the outcomes, their joint prediction power was limited due to redundancy. 2) Eight variables: age, comorbidity index, oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio, fibrinogen, and glomerular filtration rate captured most of the statistical predictive power. 3) The interpretation of clinical and laboratory variables was improved by grouping them in categories. 4) Age and organ damage-related tests were the best predictors of survival, and inflammatory-related tests were the best predictors of severity. 5) The pilot study identified several immunological tests (including chemokine ligand 10, chemokine ligand 2, and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist), that performed better than currently used tests. Conclusions: Currently used tests for clinical management of COVID 19 patients are of limited value due to redundancy, as all measure aspects of two major processes: inflammation, and organ damage. There are no independent predictors based on the quality of the nascent adaptive immune response. Understanding the limitations of current tests would improve their interpretation and simplify clinical management protocols. A systematic search for better biomarkers is urgent and feasible.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Inflammation
14.
ISA Trans ; 129(Pt A): 345-354, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1587478

ABSTRACT

We propose a mandatory invasive mechanical ventilator prototype for severe COVID-19 patients with volume and pressure control operation modes. This system comprises basic pneumatic elements and sensors. Its performance is similar to commercial equipment, and it presents robustness to external disturbances and parametric uncertainties. To develop a control strategy, we propose a mathematical model with a variable structure that incorporates the dead zone phenomenon of the proportional valve, and considers external disturbances and parametric uncertainties. Based on this model, we propose a global control strategy that is based on pressure and flow regulation controllers, which use the active disturbances rejection control structure (ADRC). In this strategy, we propose robust state observers to estimate disturbances and the signals necessary for implementing the controllers. We illustrate the performance of the prototype and the control strategy through numerical simulations and experiments. We also compare its performance with PID controllers. These results corroborate its effectiveness and the possibility of its application in invasive mechanical ventilators with a simple structure, which can significantly help critical care of COVID-19 inpatients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiration, Artificial , Critical Care/methods , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Ventilators, Mechanical
15.
Sustainability ; 13(16):8931, 2021.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1478020

ABSTRACT

This paper studies the extent to which difficulties in teleworking continue to be encountered by civil servants of the Spanish General State Administration (AGE) who, after the mandatory lockdown decreed by the Spanish Government from March to May 2020, continue to carry out their work under this modality. The results obtained support that the main difficulties are the acquisition of bad posture and problems in separating work and family life, and the presence of different types of difficulties differs depending on gender, the structure of the household, or whether the employee belongs to the levels of positions where higher qualification is required. In addition, ambiguity is expressed regarding the provision of resources and lack of training provided by the AGE.

16.
medrxiv; 2021.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.09.10.21262527

ABSTRACT

BackgroundUnderstanding humoral responses and seroprevalence in SARS-CoV-2 infection is essential for guiding vaccination strategies in both infected and uninfected individuals. MethodsWe determine the kinetics of IgM against the nucleocapsid (N) and IgG against the spike (S) and N proteins of SARS-CoV-2 in a cohort of 860 health professionals (healthy and infected) in northern Barcelona. We model the kinetics of IgG and IgM at nine time points over 13.5 months from infection, using non-linear mixed models by sex and clinical disease severity. ResultsOf the 781 participants who were followed up, 478 (61.2%) became infected with SARS-CoV-2. Significant differences were found for the three antibodies by disease severity and sex. At day 270 after diagnosis, median IgM(N) levels were already below the positivity threshold in patients with asymptomatic and mild-moderate disease, while IgG(N, S) levels remained positive to days 360 and 270, respectively. Kinetic modelling showed a general rise in both IgM(N) and IgG(N) levels up to day 30, followed by a decay whose rate depended on disease severity. IgG(S) levels increased at day 15 and remained relatively constant over time. ConclusionsWe describe kinetic models of IgM(N) and IgG(N, S) SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at 13.5 months from infection and disease spectrum. Our analyses delineate differences in the kinetics of IgM and IgG over a year and differences in the levels of IgM and IgG as early as 15 days from symptoms onset in severe cases. These results can inform public health policies around vaccination criteria. Funded by the regional Ministry of Health of the Generalitat de Catalunya (Call COVID19-PoC SLT16_04; NCT04885478)


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Infections
17.
Mathematics ; 9(17):2120, 2021.
Article in English | MDPI | ID: covidwho-1390690

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected all walks of life, including education. Universities have been forced to teach in a blended or online environment, which has led professors to adapt their traditional teaching–learning methodologies. The professors of Mathematics of Financial Operations at the University of Almeria (Spain) have created video tutorials so that students can autonomously prepare the theoretical part of the subject, leaving the face-to-face classes for practical exercises. This article aims to analyze the effectiveness of video tutorials and the autonomy finally achieved by students in their learning. For this purpose, a questionnaire was carried out in which, through 21 questions, the constructs Autonomy, Effectiveness, Depth, Format, Challenge, and Use were assessed. Based on these six latent variables, the proposed model using the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) methodology revealed that students considered the Format and Depth of the video tutorials crucial for genuinely effective performance learning and promoting their autonomy. On the other hand, the variables Challenge and Use were poorly rated. This article presents an original valuation model, which has the virtue of achieving a prediction of 78.6% and, in addition, has high predictive power.

18.
J Neuroophthalmol ; 41(3): 285-292, 2021 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1367097

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) may present or eventually develop central nervous system and ophthalmic signs and symptoms. Varying reports have emerged regarding isolation of viral RNA from these tissue sites, as well as largely autopsy-based histopathologic descriptions of the brain and the eye in patients with COVID-19. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A primary literature search was performed in literature databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library. Keywords were used alone and in combination including the following: SARS CoV-2, COVID-19, eye, brain, central nervous system, histopathology, autopsy, ocular pathology, aqueous, tears, vitreous, neuropathology, and encephalitis. RESULTS: The reported ophthalmic pathologic and neuropathologic findings in patients with SARS-CoV-2 are varied and inconclusive regarding the role of direct viral infection vs secondary pathology. The authors own experience with autopsy neuropathology in COVID-19 patients is also described. There is a particular paucity of data regarding the histopathology of the eye. However, it is likely that the ocular surface is a potential site for inoculation and the tears a source of spread of viral particles. CONCLUSIONS: Additional large postmortem studies are needed to clarify the role of SARS-CoV in the ophthalmic and neuropathologic manifestations of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Brain/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19/complications , Eye Diseases/diagnosis , Eye/diagnostic imaging , Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Eye Diseases/etiology , Humans , Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Pandemics
19.
authorea preprints; 2021.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-AUTHOREA PREPRINTS | ID: ppzbmed-10.22541.au.162136772.22862058.v2

ABSTRACT

Since the start of the COVID-19 outbreak, the race for testing new platforms designed to confer immunity against SARS-CoV-2, has been rampant and unprecedented, leading to conditional emergency authorization of various vaccines. Despite progress on early multidrug therapy for COVID-19 patients, the current mandate is to immunize the world population as quickly as possible. The lack of thorough testing in animals prior to clinical trials, and authorization based on safety data generated during trials that lasted less than 3.5 months, raise questions regarding vaccine safety. The recently identified role of SARS-CoV-2 Spike glycoprotein for inducing endothelial damage characteristic of COVID-19, even in absence of infection, is extremely relevant given that most of the authorized vaccines induce endogenous production of Spike. Given the high rate of occurrence of adverse effects that have been reported to date, as well as the potential for vaccine-driven disease enhancement, Th2-immunopathology, autoimmunity, and immune evasion, there is a need for a better understanding of the benefits and risks of mass vaccination, particularly in groups excluded from clinical trials. Despite calls for caution, the risks of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have been minimized or ignored by health organizations and government authorities. As for any investigational biomedical program, data safety monitoring boards (DSMB) and event adjudication committees (EAC), should be enacting risk mitigation. If DSMBs and EACs do not do so, we will call for a pause in mass vaccination. If DSMBs and EACs do not exist, then vaccination should be halted immediately, in particular for demographic groups at highest risk of vaccine-associated death or serious adverse effects, during such time as it takes to assemble these boards and commence critical and independent assessments. We urge for pluralistic dialogue in the context of health policies, emphasizing critical questions that require urgent answers, particularly if we wish to avoid a global erosion of public confidence in science and public health.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
20.
Journal of the Endocrine Society ; 5(Supplement_1):A912-A913, 2021.
Article in English | PMC | ID: covidwho-1221840

ABSTRACT

Background: Autoimmune hyperthyroidism also known as Graves’ disease is the leading cause of hyperthyroidism. The pathogenesis of Graves’ disease is still an area of active research. We present a case of Graves’ disease, which developed following SARS-CoV2 infection. Clinical Case: A 43-year-old man with no prior history of thyroid disease, presented for evaluation due to fatigue palpitations, tremors, and hair loss in June 2020. Earlier that month, he was diagnosed with SARS-CoV2 infection and his thyroid function tests (TFTs) during a visit to the emergency department revealed thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) level of &lt;0.010 mIU/L (0.35-4.94) with a free T4 (FT4) 1.4 ng/dL (0.7-1.5);consistent with subclinical hyperthyroidism. He continued to report palpitations and tremors and further workup was done. A thyroid ultrasound showed two sub-centimeter nodules. A thyroid uptake scan followed, which showed heterogeneous activity in the thyroid gland, (12% and 32% uptake at 6 and 24 hours respectively) with focal increased uptake in the medial lobes, without cold nodules or hot nodules. Repeat TFTs one month later showed a suppressed TSH &lt;0.010 mIU/L, and a normal FT4 1.3 ng/dL. Given suspicion for Graves’ disease, further labs were ordered. Thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) were found to be elevated at 173 % baseline (&lt;=140). Thyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibodies and thyroglobulin antibodies were also elevated at 362 IU/mL H* (&lt;=9) and 2 IU/mL H* (&lt;=1) respectively. The overall picture was consistent with evolving early Graves’ disease. Conclusion: Multiple factors are frequently cited in the pathogenesis of autoimmune hyperthyroidism including viral and bacterial infections1 and there have been several reported cases of autoimmune disease related to SARS-CoV2 infection2. This case is one of several emerging cases of autoimmune hyperthyroidism possibly linked to COVID-19. References: 1. Smith, T. J . Graves’ Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016 October 20;375:1552-1565 2. Mateu-Salat, M., Urgell, E., Chico, A. SARS-COV-2 as a trigger for autoimmune disease: report of two cases of Graves’ disease after COVID-19. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation. 2020 July 19

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL